1. Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121(Suppl 5):S2–23.[PubMed]
2. Zwaan L, De Bruijne MC, Wagner C, Thijs A, Smits M, Van der Wal G, et al. Patient record review on the incidence, consequences and causes of diagnostic adverse events. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1015–21.[PubMed]
3. Zwaan L, Thijs A, Wagner C, Van der Wal G, Timmermans D. Relating faults in diagnostic reasoning with diagnostic errors and patient harm. Acad Med. 2012;87:149–56.[PubMed]
4. Newman-Toker D, Pronovost P. Diagnostic errors – the next frontier for patient safety. J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301:1062–2.[PubMed]
5. Graber M, Plebani M. Diagnosis: a new era, a new journal. Diagnosis. 2014;1:1–2.
6. Singh H. Diagnostic errors: moving beyond ‘no respect’ and getting ready for prime time. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:789–92.[PMC free article][PubMed]
7. Wachter R. Why diagnostic errors don't get any respect -and what can be done about them. Health Aff(Millwood) 2010;29:1605–10.[PubMed]
8. Schiff G, Puopolo A, Huben-Kearney A, Yu W, Keohane C, McDonough P, et al. Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:2063–8.[PubMed]
9. Saber Tehrani A, Lee H, Mathews S, Shore A, Makary M, Pronovost P, et al. 25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:672–80.[PubMed]
10. Zwaan L, Schiff G, Singh H. Advancing the research agenda for diagnostic error reduction. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:ii52–ii7.[PMC free article][PubMed]
11. Singh H, Meyer A, Thomas E. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. Brit Med J Qual Saf. 2014;23:727–31.[PMC free article][PubMed]
12. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1493–9.[PubMed]
13. Singh H. Helping health care organizations to define diagnostic errors as missed opportunities in diagnosis. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2014;40:99–101.[PubMed]
14. Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert BL, et al. Diagnostic Error in Medicine: Analysis of 583 Physician-Reported Errors. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1881–7.[PubMed]
15. Newman-Toker D. A unified conceptual model for diagnostic errors: underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, and misdiagnosis. Diagnosis. 2014;1:43–8.
16. Arkes H, Wortmann R, Saville P, Harkness A. Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses. J Appl Psychol. 1981;66:252–4.[PubMed]
17. Henriksen K, Kaplan H. Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:ii46–ii50.[PMC free article][PubMed]
18. Edelman D. Outpatient diagnostic errors: unrecognized hyperglycemia. Eff Clin Pract. 2002;5:11–6.[PubMed]
19. Chow CK, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Islam S, Gupta R, Avezum A, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310:959–68.[PubMed]
20. Welch G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S. Overdiagnosed: making people sick in pursuit of health. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press; 2011.
21. Burroughs TE, Waterman AD, Gallagher TH, Waterman B, Adams D, Jeffe DB, et al. Patient concerns about medical errors in emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:57–64.[PubMed]
22. Hofmann B. Diagnosing overdiagnosis: conceptual challenges and suggested solutions. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29:599–604.[PubMed]
23. Moynihan R, Doust J, Henry D. Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy. Brit Med J. 2012;344:e3502.[PubMed]
24. Jørgensen K, Gøtzsche P. Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. Brit Med J. 2009;339:b2587.[PMC free article][PubMed]
25. Welch G, Black W. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:605–13.[PubMed]
26. Wiener R, Schwartz L, Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:831–7.[PMC free article][PubMed]
27. Graber M, Kumar A. Commentary: Reaching a milestone in diagnosing coeliac disease. Brit Med J. 2007;334:732.[PMC free article][PubMed]
28. Gasbarrini G, Miele L, Malandrino N, Grieco A, Addolorato G, Gasbarrini A, et al. Celiac disease in the 21st century: issues of under- and over-diagnosis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009;22:1–7.[PubMed]
29. Hamilton W, Lancashire R, Sharp D, Peters T, Cheng K, Marshall T. The risk of colorectal cancer with symptoms at different ages and between the sexes: a case-control study. BMC Med. 2009;7[PMC free article][PubMed]
30. Wears R, Nemeth C. Replacing hindsight with insight: Toward better understanding of diagnostic failures. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:206–9.[PubMed]
31. Wears R. What makes diagnosis hard? Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:19–25.[PubMed]
32. Singh H, Sittig D. Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:103–10.[PMC free article][PubMed]
33. Singh H, Giardina T, Meyer A, Forjuoh S, Reis M, Thomas E. Types and Origins of Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:418–25.[PMC free article][PubMed]
34. Singh H, Hirani K, Kadiyala H, Rudomiotov O, Davis T, Khan MM, et al. Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3307–15.[PMC free article][PubMed]
35. Brennan T, Leape L, Laird N, Hebert L, Localio A, Lawthers A, et al. Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized Patients. New Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.[PubMed]
36. Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 2004;170:1678–86.[PMC free article][PubMed]
37. Zegers M, De Bruijne MC, Wagner C, Hoonhout LH, Waaijman R, Smits M, et al. Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:297–302.[PubMed]
38. Forster A, O'Rourke K, Shojania K, Van Walraven C. Combining ratings from multiple physician reviewers helped to overcome the uncertainty associated with adverse event classification. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:892–901.[PubMed]
39. Zegers M, De Bruijne M, Wagner C, Groenewegen P, Van der Wal G, De Vet H. The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record. J Clin Epid. 2010;201063:94–102.[PubMed]
40. Shojania K. The elephant of patient safety: What you see depends on how you look. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2010;36:399–401.[PubMed]
41. Christiaans-Dingelhoff I, Smits M, Zwaan L, Lubberding S, Van der Wal G, Wagner C. To what extent are adverse events found in patient records reported by patients and healthcare professionals via complaints, claims and incident reports? BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:49.[PMC free article][PubMed]
What is a diagnostic essay?
College instructors are often faced with the need to identify their students’ strength and weakness in terms of which specific skill each student has. A diagnostic essay is used to achieve this objective. This is often used at the start of the semester to help instructors identify the kind of curriculum, exercises, and the type of exercises they need to give to students both individually and holistically. Such essays are time-bound and students need to respond to the instructors’ prompts. Diagnostic papers are effective in testing the student’s ability hence diagnostic essay writing is also used on standardized tests including SAT tests.
Occasionally, the writer is given two or more prompts and allowed to choose the one he or she likes. A diagnostic essay is best written by dividing the paper into three sections: introduction, body, and conclusion. A diagnostic essay is time-bound thus the author must set aside some time to go through the question and plan how to effectively write the essay. A captivating introduction and a clear thesis are aspects that make a diagnostic assignment to stand out.
How to start a diagnostic essay
The writer has to set aside time to read and answer the prompt, to formulate the thesis as well as plan on how to write the essay within the allocated time period. After pondering over the topic and coming up with a mental sketch of what one needs to write about, the next step is to introduce the topic. This entails reviewing the three key ideas that one would like to focus on as he writes the essay. The writer can start the introduction with a restatement of the essay prompt. For instance, if one is given a prompt to write about the most challenging task that they have ever undertaken, he will give an explanation of the hardest thing he has ever done. The writer can first list a number of tasks that he might consider to be the most challenging to him. From the mentioned options, he will then identify one specific task and pursue it. He will introduce the task and give a detailed review of the same including, for instance, nature and time period the task took, and other relevant aspects. The other key part of the introduction is the thesis statement. The thesis for a diagnostic paper will be a one sentence highlight of the three key reasons why the task is most challenging to the writer.
How to write main part of a diagnostic essay
Having written the introduction and the thesis, the next part is the essay body. The body should have three paragraphs. Each of the three paragraphs will focus on a specific idea and explain it in detail. In the first paragraph, the writer needs to point out and then explain the first reason why he or she thinks the specified task is the most challenging he or she has ever undertaken. The student should pick his or her strongest point or reason and place it in the first paragraph. Clear explanation on, for instance, the mental effort it took to accomplish the task, should be provided.
The second paragraph will outline the point or factor that the writer considers the second most important reason. For instance, in explaining the most challenging task ever undertaken, the second paragraph can focus on the financial burden or responsibility that the task brought upon the student. If one was compelled to go for an unanticipated loan which has since weighed heavily on the borrower, this can be elaborated in detail in the second body paragraph.
The third paragraph will give the third most important idea addressing the prompt. In the aforementioned example, the writer can weigh among all other remaining reasons and identify the strongest. Depending on the weight that the author attaches to each factor, the physical effort it took to complete the task can be discussed in the third paragraph. The third paragraph can also briefly touch on the other key reasons or factors which, although not critical to the prompt’s reply, have a significant impact on the bearing of the writer’s life.
How to conclude a diagnostic essay
A good diagnostic essay has an effective conclusion. The conclusion will restate the key points identified in the introduction as well as in the thesis statement. This will be done in brief and with a major focus on the main three aspects discussed in the body paragraphs. In the aforementioned example, the student can identify the mental, financial, and physical effort and highlight the connection briefly. As diagnostic essays have tight timeframes, it is of utmost importance that the writer makes the conclusion brief and ties it to the expected reply to the prompt.
Introduction – Essence, and basis of the diagnostic essay, explication of the prompt.
Body – First paragraph: first major/most important point or reason.
- Second paragraph: second key point
- Third paragraph: third key point
Conclusion – restatement of three key ideas, and link to the prompt.